<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iran: The Astrological Path to War in 2000-2020 (Part VII)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/2008/09/18/iran-the-astrological-path-to-war-in-2000-2020-part-vii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/2008/09/18/iran-the-astrological-path-to-war-in-2000-2020-part-vii/</link>
	<description>An Astrology Blog on Horary Astrology, Mundane Astrology and Natal Horoscopes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 03:14:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nina Gryphon</title>
		<link>http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/2008/09/18/iran-the-astrological-path-to-war-in-2000-2020-part-vii/comment-page-1/#comment-34610</link>
		<dc:creator>Nina Gryphon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/?p=1583#comment-34610</guid>
		<description>Neda,

Glad you like it.  You are right about the chart (I get 13 Sag, but close enough).  If anything, this chart is worse for Iran than the one I posted.  Note the setting Sun, which can show the end of a king.  

Not sure why you say that the last chart is more important?  The old Arab astrologers only ever used the degree of the mean conjunction, and did not have sufficient precision to cast a chart for the exact moment of the conjunction.  They could only look at the degree of the conjunction, not the Ascendant or anything like that.  So choosing which conjunction we want to examine is a bit of a modern luxury :)  But it appears that it is the first conjunction that is typically used.

Best wishes,
Nina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neda,</p>
<p>Glad you like it.  You are right about the chart (I get 13 Sag, but close enough).  If anything, this chart is worse for Iran than the one I posted.  Note the setting Sun, which can show the end of a king.  </p>
<p>Not sure why you say that the last chart is more important?  The old Arab astrologers only ever used the degree of the mean conjunction, and did not have sufficient precision to cast a chart for the exact moment of the conjunction.  They could only look at the degree of the conjunction, not the Ascendant or anything like that.  So choosing which conjunction we want to examine is a bit of a modern luxury <img src='http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   But it appears that it is the first conjunction that is typically used.</p>
<p>Best wishes,<br />
Nina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neda</title>
		<link>http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/2008/09/18/iran-the-astrological-path-to-war-in-2000-2020-part-vii/comment-page-1/#comment-30814</link>
		<dc:creator>Neda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/?p=1583#comment-30814</guid>
		<description>Hi Nina,

I like traditional Mundane astrology &amp; your Blog very much.

My software showes the ascendant degree of Great conj in tehran:

14 Sagittarius
Again mars is on Descendant (like 1961 Conj)

also based on time in this site (http://www.astropro.com/features/tables/geo/ju-sa/ju000sa.html):

12 Sagittarius (Exactly on Pluto!)

Another Question:
1981 Conj is a triple Conjs and Last is at 24 July (seems to be more important). 
why you elect the first conj (1 jan 1981) as main chart not last?

Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nina,</p>
<p>I like traditional Mundane astrology &amp; your Blog very much.</p>
<p>My software showes the ascendant degree of Great conj in tehran:</p>
<p>14 Sagittarius<br />
Again mars is on Descendant (like 1961 Conj)</p>
<p>also based on time in this site (<a href="http://www.astropro.com/features/tables/geo/ju-sa/ju000sa.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.astropro.com/features/tables/geo/ju-sa/ju000sa.html</a>):</p>
<p>12 Sagittarius (Exactly on Pluto!)</p>
<p>Another Question:<br />
1981 Conj is a triple Conjs and Last is at 24 July (seems to be more important).<br />
why you elect the first conj (1 jan 1981) as main chart not last?</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iran: The Astrological Path to War (Part V) : Gryphon Astrology Blog</title>
		<link>http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/2008/09/18/iran-the-astrological-path-to-war-in-2000-2020-part-vii/comment-page-1/#comment-29361</link>
		<dc:creator>Iran: The Astrological Path to War (Part V) : Gryphon Astrology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/?p=1583#comment-29361</guid>
		<description>[...] Part VII of the Iran Series &#8211; The 2000 Great Conjunction and the Khomeini horoscope. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part VII of the Iran Series &#8211; The 2000 Great Conjunction and the Khomeini horoscope. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gryphon Astrology Blog &#187; Iran: The Path to the Revolution (Part I of the Iran Series)</title>
		<link>http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/2008/09/18/iran-the-astrological-path-to-war-in-2000-2020-part-vii/comment-page-1/#comment-29022</link>
		<dc:creator>Gryphon Astrology Blog &#187; Iran: The Path to the Revolution (Part I of the Iran Series)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/?p=1583#comment-29022</guid>
		<description>[...] Part VII of the Iran Series &#8211; The 2000 Great Conjunction and the Khomeini horoscope. Bookmark to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part VII of the Iran Series &#8211; The 2000 Great Conjunction and the Khomeini horoscope. Bookmark to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yuzuru</title>
		<link>http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/2008/09/18/iran-the-astrological-path-to-war-in-2000-2020-part-vii/comment-page-1/#comment-28970</link>
		<dc:creator>yuzuru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/?p=1583#comment-28970</guid>
		<description>maybe the last lunar and solar eclipses afflicting the MC/IC axis have something to do with the recent problems in Iran?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe the last lunar and solar eclipses afflicting the MC/IC axis have something to do with the recent problems in Iran?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nina Gryphon</title>
		<link>http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/2008/09/18/iran-the-astrological-path-to-war-in-2000-2020-part-vii/comment-page-1/#comment-6599</link>
		<dc:creator>Nina Gryphon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/?p=1583#comment-6599</guid>
		<description>Hi Dirk,

Thank you for your encouragement.  I have already worked out the specific years when I believe Iran is most at risk of war, but still need to write the post.  And yes, one of those years does &quot;hawktail&quot; with the next presidency.

Best wishes,
Nina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dirk,</p>
<p>Thank you for your encouragement.  I have already worked out the specific years when I believe Iran is most at risk of war, but still need to write the post.  And yes, one of those years does &#8220;hawktail&#8221; with the next presidency.</p>
<p>Best wishes,<br />
Nina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirk DeVries</title>
		<link>http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/2008/09/18/iran-the-astrological-path-to-war-in-2000-2020-part-vii/comment-page-1/#comment-6561</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk DeVries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 08:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/?p=1583#comment-6561</guid>
		<description>Nina,

Thank you for the huge amount of work concerning Iran and its future. I am looking forward to the next installment. Especially since your deliniation of McCain&#039;s probability to be crowned as our president, hawktails with Iran&#039;s future. This is pretty spooky stuff. Please continue.

Dirk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nina,</p>
<p>Thank you for the huge amount of work concerning Iran and its future. I am looking forward to the next installment. Especially since your deliniation of McCain&#8217;s probability to be crowned as our president, hawktails with Iran&#8217;s future. This is pretty spooky stuff. Please continue.</p>
<p>Dirk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nina Gryphon</title>
		<link>http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/2008/09/18/iran-the-astrological-path-to-war-in-2000-2020-part-vii/comment-page-1/#comment-5601</link>
		<dc:creator>Nina Gryphon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/?p=1583#comment-5601</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

I disagree about the orb, at least relative to the Jupiter-Saturn conjunction.  Lilly uses a 5 degree orb for the major stars.  Now, if you are trying to pinpoint the location, as you did NYC, then yes, you want a very small orb, since a small change in the location may put Algol right on the MC.

Best wishes,
Nina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>I disagree about the orb, at least relative to the Jupiter-Saturn conjunction.  Lilly uses a 5 degree orb for the major stars.  Now, if you are trying to pinpoint the location, as you did NYC, then yes, you want a very small orb, since a small change in the location may put Algol right on the MC.</p>
<p>Best wishes,<br />
Nina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/2008/09/18/iran-the-astrological-path-to-war-in-2000-2020-part-vii/comment-page-1/#comment-5591</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryphonastrology.com/blog/?p=1583#comment-5591</guid>
		<description>Hello Nina,

I really like your blog. But a 3 degree orb for a fixed star conjunction is a bit wide- even for Algol. The Grand Conjunction of 2000 cast for New York City has the MC at 26 Taurus conjunct Algol- which does reflect the 9/11 attack, and possibly current economic events there.

Keep up the good work,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Nina,</p>
<p>I really like your blog. But a 3 degree orb for a fixed star conjunction is a bit wide- even for Algol. The Grand Conjunction of 2000 cast for New York City has the MC at 26 Taurus conjunct Algol- which does reflect the 9/11 attack, and possibly current economic events there.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

